Elizabeth Warren And Health Care - How Communism Works. by Dean Gotcher

Elizabeth Warren And Health Care - How Communism Works.

by
Dean Gotcher

"... open textured..." "We need to know what the goal is ... coverage for everybody." "It matters who's at the table." "This is going to be a process that is fundamentally about respecting the fact that we've got to work together on this." "It is not that I have a plan that says we are going to do this part and then we are going to do this part and then we are going to do this part. No instead my plan is were going to get to a table like this, were going to make sure everybody is going to get represented, were going to understand the urgency of the moment, to get this solved." Elizabeth Warren

The tower of babble is something we can all look up to that we all had a part in building, i.e., is the result of the consensus (soviet) process. If you are not working with us, you are against us, needing to be removed (replaced).

It is all about using the consensus (soviet) process to solve problems, negating the individuals right of religion and speech, i.e., true representation in the process. The outcome, i.e., the goal 'justifies' the means. In the consensus (soviet) process representation (who sits at the table setting policy) is not who the people vote for (choose) but who the facilitator (dictator) determines needs to be at the table—bypassing the voice of the people.

AUDIO of Elizabeth Warren explaining how she will use communism, i.e., the consensus (soviet) process in order to control the people. The process is more important in determining what the peoples needs are and how to meet them than the peoples rights (freedoms) are.

A soviet is:

1) a diverse group of people,

(including the disenfranchised, discontent, deviant, i.e., those who hate capitalism, who hate authority, i.e., who hate true representative government, etc.,—who the people did not select, i.e., vote for to represent them, who have to be included in the meeting in order to negate the outcome being in favor of those in authority, i.e., the capitalist, i.e., the constituents, who would guarantee their rights of religion, speech, individualism, etc., [while diversity based upon race, religion, etc., is not the issue it is who in the meeting will prevent the consensus, i.e., the soviet process from making law and establishing policy. To pre-determine the solution to a problem, i.e., how to solve it is to get in the way of the consensus process, which is to determine the solution to the problem itself, the problem being capitalism, i.e., true representation which would prevent the consensus, i.e., the soviet process from taking place. Truth, i.e., "the rest of the story" gets in the way of the consensus process. The consensus process, i.e., choosing who will be sitting at the table (in order to control the outcome) makes the "the people" subject to those who are in power instead of those in power being subject to "the people," i.e., who determine who will be sitting at the table.]),

2) dialoguing opinions to a consensus,

(there is not capitalism, i.e., father's/Father's authority in dialogue, only the "feelings," i.e., "self interests" of all who are participating, who, wanting pleasure, hate restraint, i.e., hate capitalism, i.e., hate having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline, i.e., "capitulate" their "self" to authority—in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Therefore in consensus, i.e., a "feeling" of "oneness" there is no father's/Father's authority, i.e., capitalism in the outcome, only the collective "feeling" of all participates, compromising established commands, rules, facts, and truth in order to "feel" good about one another, i.e., themselves.)

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

3) over social issues,

(making all individuals subject to the collective, i.e., society, negating individualism under God)

"It is not individualism [under the father's/Father's authority, i.e., capitalism] that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him. Society ["human relationship based upon self interest," i.e., pleasure] is the necessary framework through which freedom [from the father's/Father's authority] and individuality [being "of and for self"] are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx)

4) in a facilitated, i.e., a "group psychotherapy," i.e., Transformational Marxist meeting,

(this process does not come about naturally since people, being selfish, tending to go in the direction of capitalism, wanting others to work for them, therefore there is the need for someone trained in how to seduce, deceive, and manipulate all in the group to participate in the soviet, i.e., in communism, i.e., in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process in order to come to an agreement, i.e., affirmation on what to do for "the people," and how to do it—without capitalism)

5) to a pre-determined outcome (the goal is not just "health care" it is the process that is being used to implement it),

(that no social decision be made outside of the consensus process).

"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

This is what Elizabeth Warren explained—on how she will get (force) people to participate in her health care program, i.e., the consensus process, i.e., communism.

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the student's "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., their love pleasures and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the child's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation," since the father's/Father's authority, and the guilty conscience which it engenders, is negative to the child's carnal nature), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human-ist resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal desires) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12